Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 35(supl. 1): 82-88, abr. - mayo 2022. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-205355

RESUMO

We shall define occupational pneumonia as a diseaseof external origin, closely tied to the workplace setting andcaused by biological microorganisms. The main pathogens arebacteria, fungi and viruses. There are a number of occupationsspecifically prone to the possibility of acquiring pneumoniawhen performing work duties.In addition to the diagnostic methods and drug treatments current in infectious processes, a good clinical history,with avoidance and protection measures would be the mostimportant tools for the management of occupational pneumonia.Social and demographic changes in the last two decadeshave made zoonotic infections, and especially viruses, the maincause of new infections. Human health and animal health areclosely linked, so collaboration between veterinarians and doctors, together with the necessary environmental respect andconservation, plus the appropriate public policies are essentialto avoid these wide negative effects. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/parasitologia , Trabalho , Saúde Ocupacional , Zoonoses
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 115: 39-47, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34800689

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyse differences in clinical presentation and outcome between bacteraemic pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (B-PCAP) and sSvere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia. METHODS: This observational multi-centre study was conducted on patients hospitalized with B-PCAP between 2000 and 2020 and SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in 2020. Thirty-day survival, predictors of mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were compared. RESULTS: In total, 663 patients with B-PCAP and 1561 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were included in this study. Patients with B-PCAP had more severe disease, a higher ICU admission rate and more complications. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia had higher in-hospital mortality (10.8% vs 6.8%; P=0.004). Among patients admitted to the ICU, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (69.7% vs 36.2%; P<0.001) and mortality were higher in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. In patients with B-PCAP, the predictive model found associations between mortality and systemic complications (hyponatraemia, septic shock and neurological complications), lower respiratory reserve and tachypnoea; chest pain and purulent sputum were protective factors in these patients. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, mortality was associated with previous liver and cardiac disease, advanced age, altered mental status, tachypnoea, hypoxaemia, bilateral involvement, pleural effusion, septic shock, neutrophilia and high blood urea nitrogen; in contrast, ≥7 days of symptoms was a protective factor in these patients. In-hospital mortality occurred earlier in patients with B-PCAP. CONCLUSIONS: Although B-PCAP was associated with more severe disease and a higher ICU admission rate, the mortality rate was higher for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and deaths occurred later. New prognostic scales and more effective treatments are needed for patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumonia Pneumocócica , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/complicações , Respiração Artificial , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Respiration ; 96(5): 406-416, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29996130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Knowing the cost of hospitalizations for exacerbation in bronchiectasis patients is essential to perform cost-effectiveness studies of treatments that aim to reduce exacerbations in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To find out the mean cost of hospitalizations due to exacerbations in bronchiectasis patients, and to identify factors associated with higher costs. METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicenter study in adult bronchiectasis patients hospitalized due to exacerbation. All expenses from the patients' arrival at hospital to their discharge were calculated: diagnostic tests, treatments, transferals, home hospitalization, admission to convalescence centers, and hospitals' structural costs for each patient (each hospital's tariff for emergencies and 70% of the price of a bed for each day in a hospital ward). RESULTS: A total of 222 patients (52.7% men, mean age 71.8 years) admitted to 29 hospitals were included. Adding together all the expenses, the mean cost of the hospitalization was EUR 5,284.7, most of which correspond to the hospital ward (86.9%), and particularly to the hospitals' structural costs. The adjusted multivariate analysis showed that chronic bronchial infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, days spent in the hospital, and completing the treatment with home hospitalization were factors independently associated with a higher overall cost of the hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The mean cost of a hospitalization due to bronchiectasis exacerbation obtained from the individual data of each episode is higher than the cost per process calculated by the health authorities. The most determining factor of a higher cost is chronic bronchial infection due to P. aeruginosa, which leads to a longer hospital stay and the use of home hospitalization.


Assuntos
Bronquiectasia/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...